It’s important that the board conducts a thorough director review. The process should be clear and timely as well as assist the board to understand its strengths and weaknesses so that it can improve the performance of the company.
It can be difficult to measure the performance of directors individually. The chair’s role on the board has a huge impact on the other directors. It’s also challenging to compare boards due differences in strategy, company cycles, and director refreshment policies.
A director board review could take many forms and the way the review is conducted will impact how honest the feedback received will be. Some evaluations are relatively informal – simply announcing the views of other directors – whereas others are more structured such as interviews with other directors as well https://directorboard.info/a-compendium-of-the-most-popular-virtual-data-room-providers-and-a-comprehensive-comparison-of-their-security-features/ as the SID or CEO, committee chairs, and the Company Secretary. The evaluation could include observations made by the Chairman at board meetings – examining things like the level of inclusion as well as information sharing and the sharing of discussions.
It is often beneficial to employ an external facilitator who is experienced in conducting these reviews. their neutrality can add rigour and objectivity to the process. The most important thing is to begin the process by defining the goals of the review and defining its scope. Once that’s done the next step is to formulate a plan for how to assess the board and gain insight from stakeholders. This could mean the distribution of questionnaires and interviews, document reviews or using board meeting management software.